NoSlaves.com

Cyberactivism on Trade, Economics and Labor Arbitrage

NoSlaves.com header image 2

Hillary Clinton, India’s Best Representative

September 13th, 2007 · 1 Comment

The Washington Post did an expose about Hillary Clinton (D- Punjab)’s Personal Financial and Political Ties

Punjab Hillary

At a recent event in Los Angeles, host Nadadur Vardhan told those gathered that they should support Clinton because “she may shift more jobs to India,”, according to an Indian news account

Yes indeed. Let’s follow the money, shall we?

Indian businessman Sant Singh Chatwal raised $500,000 for her in his Upper East Side penthouse, including $210,000 from 14 entities connected to him. Chatwal is now a finance co-chairman for Clinton’s presidential campaign.
Some Indian American connections have benefited the Clintons personally, too. Vinod Gupta, the founder of a Nebraska data-mining firm, has donated more than $1 million to the Clintons’ political causes while also paying the former president at least $3.3 million as a business consultant.

Now, I don’t know about you, but I expect someone running for President of the United States to be representing the interests of the American people! I do not expect them to be using those who are not loyal to the United States, regardless of their citizenship status, promoting an agenda which lines their own pockets as well as a foreign nation and business interests!

What about Americans? Why is someone representing offshore outsourcing Indian companies and India’s interests leading in the polls? What is wrong with the American people? Or is this story silenced in the main stream media?

censorship

It is well known that India uses US front groups and firms to lobby in our Government and Hillary Clinton is chair of the India caucus, i.e. dedicated to representing a foreign nation and foreign corporations while crafting United States policy.

UC Davis Professor, Norm Matloff also wrote Newletter pointing out the foreign interest connections to Senator Clinton. There is an article referenced where the India strategy is:

The Washington lobbyist who represents some of the Indian companies said that when the opposition paints outsourcing as bad for the United States, proponents can counter by making Americans the face of Indian companies

Matloff thinks Clinton will get away with this. She can sell out the American worker and no one blinks an eye. Let’s face it, the Obama camp was dead on in exposing these foreign interest connections to Clinton, yet amazingly they had to apologize. For what? Telling the Truth?

big brother Hillary

I’m a Democrat, but I’m sorry on this one I just cannot comply and march in step. No, we cannot have someone who is bought and paid for to offshore outsource our jobs, our economic strength, have more corporate written by and for trade deals and the rest of this sort of corrupt buying of a President that will surely sink our nation.

Share and Recommend: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Fark
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • Smarking
  • SphereIt
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Webride
  • Netscape
  • TailRank
  • Shadows
  • Blue Dot
  • StumbleUpon
  • NewsVine
Email This Post To A Friend Email This Post To A Friend

Tags: Election '08 · Outsourcing · H-1B

 

 

RSS Comments Feed

spacer Pingback by NoSlaves.com
not yet rated
  + -
2007-12-07 10:51:32

[…] is a good thing, certainly most of Edwards positions are more in line with working America (see Clinton on H-1B and yes Obama is about as […]

 

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.